TV

I love (and hate) that ‘Game of Thrones’ has blown past the books

Kelly Lawler
USA TODAY
Peter Dinklage as Tyrion, Nathalie Emmanuel as Missandei and Emilia Clarke as Dany in a scene from Season 6 of 'Game of Thrones.'

In 2015, at the end of Game of Thrones Season 5, I wasn’t happy

The season had been a huge disappointment, a mix of gratuitous sexual violence and poor writing that left me frustrated rather than entertained. The finale further demoralized me about the series’ future. It brought several of the major characters' stories — including Cersei (Lena Headey), Jon (Kit Harington) and Daenerys (Emilia Clarke) — to the end of their narratives in George R.R. Martin's Song of Ice and Fire books, on which the series is based. As a reader, I couldn’t help but wonder where the series was headed.

Sign up for the Postcards from Westeros Newsletter

 

A year later, I was pleasantly surprised by the sixth season, which, rather than flailing without the guidance of the source material, thrived on its newfound independence. The books had a habit of wheel-spinning to preserve the status quo for hundreds of pages, and the series mirrored this slow pace. But in Season 6, Thrones began running at full speed, allowing characters to meet or reunite, to move across the vast fictional world and to get closer to their ultimate goals (or their ultimate demise). 

Dany sailed for Westeros. Cersei murdered her way to the Iron Throne. Bran confirmed that Jon was the son of Rhaegar Targaryen and Lyanna Stark. And that was just the finale.

As the series begins its seventh season, and starts setting up its conclusion (only 13 episodes remain, including seven this year) I’m excited to see it continue this momentum and deliver a satisfying finale. But I’m also a little heartbroken that these characters will finish their stories on screen before they even get close on the page. Martin plans two more books to finish the saga.  

This isn’t really a problem for either the creators or Martin, who is free to write on his own schedule. The author could also surprise us with the sixth installment, The Winds of Winter, at any point, followed by a seventh novel, A Dream of Spring. But the timing makes it unlikely that he'll beat Thrones to its conclusion. 

George R. R. Martin hugs 'Game of Thrones' co-creator David Benioff at the 2016 Emmys.

It’s more than just wanting to avoid having the series “spoil” future books. I’ve already seen events that I’ll likely read about later. It’s that I know I’m losing the opportunity to find out what happens to Dany and Jon and Sansa through the medium I first met them. The series and the books are very different, as both Martin and the producers like to point out, and I miss the story the book was telling all on its own.

Like so many other fans, I have a personal connection to the books. They’re written in point-of-view chapters, and go inside the heads of many characters. I experienced them alone, without the deafening drumbeat the series now sparks on social media. My version of live-tweeting the Red Wedding? I went to my dad, a fan of the books for years, and he told me, “The Starks were never very good at the game, anyway.” Maybe he should have tweeted it during Season 3. 

I’m excited for Thrones to answer its mysteries and go out on a big and (probably) fiery note. I just wish I was reading about it, too.